August September 2021 Archives - The Instrumentalist /category/august-september-2021/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:55:46 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 What the Fall Season Could Be /august-september-2021/what-the-fall-season-could-be-2/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:55:46 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/what-the-fall-season-could-be-2/   photo courtesy of Smith Walbridge Clinics     The resumption of fall activities presents challenges and opportunities for those who teach and adjudicate the marching arts. This hit home for me recently when I judged the Maine All-State virtual jazz and solo and ensemble festivals.     Many schools have had no in-person music […]

The post What the Fall Season Could Be appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
 

photo courtesy of Smith Walbridge Clinics

    The resumption of fall activities presents challenges and opportunities for those who teach and adjudicate the marching arts. This hit home for me recently when I judged the Maine All-State virtual jazz and solo and ensemble festivals.
    Many schools have had no in-person music classes this year. Others have had truncated student contact and socially distanced outdoor rehearsals. The groups that prepared recordings for the festival crammed six months’ of rehearsal work into a month. A few groups rehearsed virtually and made the recording that way. One group rehearsed virtually, and the only time they were in the same room was for the recording. The results were remarkable.
    I thought about the upcoming fall season as I evaluated these performances. The need for empathy was strong, but also the need for honest, accurate assessments. I constantly put myself in the shoes of the director. What will we be hearing, seeing, and teaching in
the fall? In many cases, programs of less complexity. The groups that I heard played literature of more modest difficulty out of necessity. A test of great teaching is great programming. Directors who pay attention to this area will produce results that judges can praise and reward.
    Ensemble skills may be very rusty, especially early in the season. Judges should note this, but be sure to search for moments when the ensemble’s potential peeks through. Staffs need to redouble their commitment to the basics. The temptation to take shortcuts will be great. Both judges and staffs need to be patient with this part of the process. This is a great opportunity for a reset for the relationship between adjudicators and staffs.
    After suspending the 2020 season DCI faced dilemmas in how to approach programming. The results indicate that many groups wanted to reestablish a strong audience connection. Phantom Regiment and Cadets programmed greatest-hits material from previous years for DCI’s truncated, non-competitive season. The initial reaction was very positive. This audience-friendly approach extended to others. Blue Knights programmed music of Louis Armstrong, and Boston      Crusaders planned music by Perez Prado and Billy May. Rosemont Cavaliers announced a show with a simple message – roses, riffing off the group’s physical location and including La Vie En Rose and Sing, Sing, Sing. Under normal circumstances, these groups would never have performed literature of this sort.
    A season without competition encouraged several groups to put concern for audience involvement first. This is encouraging. The world will certainly not be worse for having Rainbow Connection on the field. This may be an opportunity for a creative reboot
    Drum corps has for some time grappled with a balance between esoteric and populist. Because of the groups that succeeded in competition, the pendulum had swung solidly esoteric, at the expense of audience engagement. Michael Cesario tried to reverse that trend when he was DCI’s artistic director and made a great deal of progress. Lessons learned post-Covid may accelerate that trend. Applause can be addictive. The question all marching arts organizations must ask is, “Do pandemic-weary audiences want heady programs or are they simply looking to be entertained?” History can offer a useful guide – whether it be the Depression-era escapism of Busby Berkeley’s films or the swing dancing craze that swept the nation at that same time. (The latter makes Cavaliers’ choice of Sing, Sing, Sing prescient.) How this translates to venues like Bands of America, where message shows have been predominant recently, will be fascinating to watch.
    Many teachers have had horrendous schedules and had to develop educational strategies and curricula on the fly. Their work to keep music alive has been heroic. The same applies to the students. This is the opportunity to revel in this work. Teachers and students will be eager for feedback. One suspects all involved will be ecstatic to have band back. Adjudicators probably can’t wait to judge again, and performers and staff long to thrill audiences again. This is a fresh start, a new and promising day.
    All concerned should be prepared for a rebuild, as some programs could have significant attrition. When continuity in music programs is broken, it is tough to recover the lost year of music development. There may be smaller groups and lesser skills on display for now. Some bands may be very young, but this fall marching band season can be a celebration of triumph over adversity. What a great lesson for our students! 

The post What the Fall Season Could Be appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
Working with Judges /august-september-2021/working-with-judges-2/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:48:27 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/working-with-judges-2/   photo courtesy of Smith Walbridge Clinics     A key part of music contests is developing healthy relationships with the judging community. These relationships are important to the growth of your group and can sometimes be challenging and frustrating.     No one wants rocky relationships, but that happens more frequently than we would […]

The post Working with Judges appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
 

photo courtesy of Smith Walbridge Clinics

    A key part of music contests is developing healthy relationships with the judging community. These relationships are important to the growth of your group and can sometimes be challenging and frustrating.
    No one wants rocky relationships, but that happens more frequently than we would like. If there is tension between judges and staffs, nobody is at their best and the free flow of information slows to a dribble. This is unfortunate and avoidable. At its best, interaction with the judging community is symbiotic. The possibilities for meaningful collaboration between judges and staffs are significant and central to student growth. That, and not the competitive result, should be the bottom line. When it isn’t, problems – occasionally major – occur. Ego has ruined more than a few opportunities for teaching and learning.
    I grew up in competitive drum corps in the mid-1960s and have taught it since the early 1970s. Many great professional relationships, but more than a few frustrations, have come from this experience. In the late 1970s and ‘80s, Drum Corps International was like the Wild West for teachers and judges. There were such visionary judges as Bernard Baggs, Don Angelica, George Olivierio and Shirlee Whitcomb, but also those of another stripe. I recall one judge railing at my group’s performance, and then adding, “but everybody on the East Coast sounds terrible this year.” This was a prominent judge, but one who had limited teaching and no writing experience. Two of the top three DCI finalists that year came from the East.
    John Phillips, then a young brass judge, was a much-needed mentor. Once, a constructive critique led a few days later to two unsolicited pages of suggestions from John. He was invested; he wanted my group to improve. Things later improved in DCI, and John remains an essential part of that. When I entered public education, this approach was vital for my staff and the progress of our groups. The judges and those judged are in this together.
    Here are some things to remember as you approach your next season of judge interactions:
    •    You can choose to make the judging community be an extension of your educational faculty. If you believe this, your staff must share that belief. Hold them accountable for approaching things in that way. If they want to vent about a judge, let them vent to you.
    •    Judges want you to succeed. No judge wants groups to look or sound bad. Most of us have walked in your shoes. We are pulling for you.
    •    When judges offer ideas and suggestions, you have to momentarily suspend ownership and ego, and accept what is said objectively. This is particularly true for designers. It can feel like someone is calling your spouse or child ugly. It is helpful to think, “Maybe this isn’t as good as I thought it is. How can we make it better?” Then ask for help.
    •    Avoid the trap of thinking that “The judges are trying to rewrite our show.” Usually, this is not the case. Sometimes it may be that your design intent is not clear. You can point out politely what the judge has missed. As a judge, I love having that conversation because I learn more about the show and can help the staff define how to clarify the designers’ intent through the performance. The best approach is to say, “The next time I’d like you to notice….” Or, “We need you to credit….”
    •    Do not disparage a judge to your students. Many of us grew up with directors who said, “The judges hate us” or “We’ll do better with out-of-state judges.” This doesn’t explain an outcome or encourage the students. Instead, they end up thinking the system is rigged, which it isn’t.
    •    Occasionally, judges make errors. If you must address this with the group, say, “I don’t agree with how this judge saw things, but let’s see what we can learn.” Then, make your case to the judge administrator in a calm, factual way. This is a teaching moment for your students, and a good judge administrator will help you negotiate these rough seas.
    •    The staffs that listen most closely and act on that input get the most information from the panels and ultimately come closest to their group’s potential. There is nothing more frustrating for a judge than to give good information and suggestions to staff and discover later that they have not implemented any of them. When I first started judging marching band, a director came into the critique and announced, “I am not going to change anything.” So, a deeply flawed design was left unfixed. I felt bad for his students.
    •    Make sure your show has pacing and transitions that you can defend. Those areas tend to be groups’ greatest weaknesses and are hard to fix in the short fall season.
    •    Do not discuss or disparage other groups in critique. Word will get back to those groups, and judges will lose respect for you.
    •    Take critiques seriously. It is disheartening to have staff from a band that has performed early in the show come into critique without having listened to the judge audio files. There is usually no good excuse for this, and it’s not very respectful.
    •    Be the model for your staff and students. Competition is unhealthy only if you let it be.
    •    Consider sending out a libretto that lists staff and a brief description of your program. If you can, include links to the source material. Judges who are invested will do their summer listening for two reasons: to better serve the bands and to become more musically literate. We are lifelong learners.
    •    Be patient with inexperienced judges. Some may be evaluating you for years. You can help them improve or make them an enemy.
    •    Be self-critical about why effects aren’t working. The idea in your head may be great, but does it translate? The rise in narrative shows has been a good development in the marching arts but creates problems if the idea is too abstract. Seek judges’ help in making the intent clear. What is clear to you isn’t always clear to us.

    I recently did an in-service with one of the more creative staffs with which I deal. They had a clear narrative with a coherent story. The titles of the tunes furthered the narrative. However, somehow the intent was murky and didn’t articulate what the staff intended. Further study revealed that the lyrics told the story but were not reflected in the music the staff chose. (The band did not use voice patches.) That band would have been better served with music that had nothing to do with the narrative but reflected the moods of the show. Sometimes what looks great on paper is ineffective in practice. We discovered that in a post-season post-mortem, which leads to this next point.

    •    Think beyond the season. Judge relationships don’t have to end with the finals. When I was brass caption head of the Boston Crusaders, I asked the chief brass judge’s permission to send a short survey to selected judges, that asked for their perceptions of our weaknesses and strengths and suggestions for the future. We got information that shaped our winter’s approach, and the next year the group improved exponentially.
    •    Ask a judge you respect to do an off-season in-service with your staff.

    The reward of judging is much more than the paycheck; it comes from the joy of helping staffs and groups develop. There are many groups with talented, creative staffs that just need a gentle guiding hand. Staff, it is up to you to be open and come with your ego checked at the door. Judges, it is up to us to always be willing to be patient mentors. We are all part of a continuum.

The post Working with Judges appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
Connecting Cultures Through Band /august-september-2021/connecting-cultures-through-band/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:39:59 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/connecting-cultures-through-band/       Going into the 2020-2021 year, I wondered what school would be like. Would I see my students in person? Would they show up online? Would we be able to play safely as a group? Are they all right physically and emotionally? How are they affected by the social injustices happening? I did […]

The post Connecting Cultures Through Band appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
 
    Going into the 2020-2021 year, I wondered what school would be like. Would I see my students in person? Would they show up online? Would we be able to play safely as a group? Are they all right physically and emotionally? How are they affected by the social injustices happening? I did not want to base my professional learning goals on numbers or the ratings students received at evaluations. I wanted room to take care of them as people but still help them grow as musicians. Also, I wanted to step away from the familiar, start programming music from other cultures, and give students meaningful context for the music we played. With those ideas in mind, I decided to program about twenty percent more music from other cultures and become more knowledgeable about cultures and performance practices.
    I entered teaching to create an equitable classroom where all students felt safe, seen, and valued. However, as a young teacher, I did not know how to accomplish this. This inexperience was amplified by teaching in places where I was an outsider and did not always feel comfortable going against community norms, risking being labeled as a radical and fired. Having attended conference sessions and virtual roundtables about creating equitable spaces and diversity in band, I know many teachers wonder how to begin. We want to be inclusive but feel uncomfortable with our situation, afraid of our own biases, or worried about our reputation in the community if we even appear to take a stand on certain issues. However, your silence can be perceived by students as being complicit with the injustices in the world.
    Before discussing culture in class, a good relationship with students is essential. This year I chose only to go into this topic with my seventh- and eighth-graders. I felt that I did not know my sixth graders well enough for this discussion after only interacting with them in virtual classes. I knew my seventh and eighth graders as individuals and how they interacted in groups, so I could anticipate their responses and guide them in respectful, open conversations.

Research
    Before introducing any activities to students, I did my research. There are plenty of resources online about how to speak to students of different ages about culture. I also benefited from multiple courses in my master’s degree that addressed cultural appropriation and authenticity in programming.
    The Iceberg Concept of Culture is a great starting place. This concept explores the idea that such aspects of culture as food, music, clothing, crafts, and celebration are like the top of an iceberg resting above the water. A casual observer can see these parts of a culture. However, as you go deeper, the next section of the iceberg just below the water includes interpretations of culture or how people’s culture affects their behavior in certain situations. The deepest part of the iceberg is a culture’s core values. These are the most significant part and inform the rest of the iceberg. These core values explain how people decide what is good or bad and what they deem acceptable or not. The majority of a culture is invisible, and the deepest part of the iceberg represents the institutions of influence. You can find examples of the Iceberg Concept of Culture from PBS Learning Media’s website. I found this concept helpful in collecting research and deciding how to talk about culture in class. However, when working with my students, we discussed the cultural iceberg only briefly to illustrate how deeply culture is rooted in people.

Getting Started
    To begin, I divided students into small groups and asked them to define culture and share their answers with the class. Culture is a construct and contains so many aspects. Hearing students express their ideas helped me to understand their thoughts and what they remembered from social studies classes. (For those who like graphic organizers, a KWL chart works well here.) Next, I filled in some gaps in their definitions. I noted that culture is an umbrella term for social behaviors and norms found in human societies. Finally, we discussed how people learn culture. Humans are not born knowing culture; they pick it up from people around them.

Discussion Rules
    We continued with a large group discussion about how to speak about culture in class. We set ground rules for discussion because many parts of culture are deeply personal. I took notes so students could see the ideas and refer back to them. Encourage students to set the rules. You can guide them, but they will have good ideas. Students generally do not want to be mean or insensitive.
    Often, when middle school students say something insensitive or inappropriate towards a group of people they are repeating what they have heard. Take a careful approach to correcting these comments. If a student says something inappropriate, they may not know it is hurtful.
    Do not shame students when correcting them. If you act shocked or respond harshly, they often shut down and miss the chance to learn. Researcher and author Brené Brown defines shame as “the intensely painful feeling or experience of believing that we are flawed and therefore unworthy of love and belonging – something we’ve experienced, done, or failed to do makes us unworthy of connection.”
    A good way to respond when a student says something inappropriate is to ask, “why?” or “what do you mean by that?” Over the past few years, I have adopted this as my blanket response when students say something hurtful or inappropriate. It causes them to pause and think, and frequently they realize a particular comment is problematic, and the issue resolves itself. If the student genuinely does not know a statement is harmful, address them in a one-on-one conversation about treating others with respect.
    A few ground rules my students came up with were:

    ●    No one is forced to share.
    ●    Keep an open mind.
    ●    Be respectful.
    ●    Listen when others are talking.

Exploring Culture
    After setting these guidelines, students again split into small groups to think of examples of their culture in America, the South, Georgia, Monroe County, and even their own families. While students talked, I kept our rules projected as a reminder of the norms for discussion. After about 5-10 minutes (or once I heard conversations starting to drift) we came together to discuss each of these cultures. Many student responses about their culture lived at the top of the iceberg, but a few made it just below the surface. Then, we had a large group discussion on the areas of culture.
    At this point, I also asked students about their experiences visiting other places. These stories can illustrate that unique experiences affect how we see and interact with culture. To encourage students to share their experiences, I exposed a vulnerability and told them about the culture shock I felt in my first position teaching elementary music in North Dakota. I grew up in the South and expected a kindergarten student to say “yes ma’am.” When I said this to her, she looked at me like I was from Mars. My current students, mostly native Georgians, found this culture clash hilarious.
    When teachers share a past mistake, it makes them more human, and students remember it. Sharing my misunderstanding allowed students to feel more comfortable talking about their experiences. Some students shared personal and touching information about their family cultures. Some chose not to share, and that was also fine. When covering these complex topics, I want to make sure that everyone stays engaged.
    As students shared their experiences, I avoided language that affirmed or negated their experience and instead said, “thank you.” If you use responses like “good,” “perfect,” “fantastic,” or “okay,” students may take those as validation or negation of what they shared. Their classmates are listening as well. It is common for people to unintentionally affirm experiences that are closely aligned with their own. Using neutral responses for all students averts the problem of elevating certain experiences.
    In talking about family cultures I discussed how as adults they can decide which parts of their family culture to keep and which to change. I revealed that I grew up in a similar but still different family culture than my spouse, and that there are elements that we each brought to our shared family and others that we have agreed to change. It is important for students to hear that one day they will have control over the culture of their home.

Programming Music
    The other component of my goal for the year was to incorporate this study of culture into the music we played. The pieces I chose for my students were African Folk Trilogy by Anne McGinty, Sakura arranged by Mike Story, and African Festival arranged by Quincy Hilliard. I searched for pieces that were authentic to their respective cultures and appropriately challenging.
    Avoid music that is written “in the style of” as such pieces will not provide your students with authentic experiences and are disrespectful to those who belong to those cultures. Look for arrangements of traditional songs or pieces written by people from the culture you are studying. The goal should be for students to begin to develop a true understanding and not just a superficial or stereotypical awareness.
    We must teach them about the actual thing and not just an idea or interpretation from an outsider. For example, I was intrigued by a piece about a spirit in Pueblo culture. After further study, I discovered that the music had nothing to do with the ceremony for the spirits, nor any part of the Pueblo tradition. It just had the name and a certain sound, so I skipped it.

Connecting to the Culture
    No matter which pieces you use, find ways to bring in people connected to what you are studying. I used YouTube videos to do this. For African Folk Trilogy, I found examples of people performing the original folk songs. When learning about Sakura and hanami, watching the blooming of the cherry blossoms, we watched a YouTube video of some friends in Tokyo sharing tips for how to hanami. A nearby cherry blossom festival in Macon, Georgia was an opportunity for my students to compare and contrast their experiences with cherry blossoms to those of people in Tokyo.
    I worried about how to discuss the background of Quincy Hilliard’s African Festival, a setting of Siyahamba, an anti-apartheid song from South Africa. I never learned about apartheid in school and felt uncomfortable about teaching the important meaning behind the piece. I did some research, and then showed students videos about Nelson Mandela as well as some by author and comedian Trevor Noah speaking about his childhood in South Africa. Many students were familiar with Trevor Noah, so his videos created a nice bridge that connected something new with the familiar. Also, I was honest with students that these were topics I did not learn about in school but were important parts of history and that I was learning right along with them.
    Even better than showing students videos is bringing people into your classroom. If you know a teacher, parent, or community member with direct knowledge about a culture, bring them in to speak with your students. Always try to get your students as close to the source as possible, as this makes the experience much more enriching.

No Politics
    I firmly believe in checking politics at the door when I teach. I never make these conversations political and redirect statements that veer this way. I do not address what any politician or political party says or does. Instead of being guided by politics, I follow a teaching philosophy that all humans deserve equal access to high-quality music education. I also believe my students deserve an education that sees them as individuals and gives them the opportunity to form opinions. I never tell my students what to believe or think. Instead, I guide conversations, encourage them to develop thoughts, and never avoid important, but challenging topics.
    I mentioned at the beginning how so many directors want to make changes happen. It begins with educating yourself, getting a little uncomfortable, and then trying something new in your classroom. It will be okay. Your students are human, even the seventh graders. They appreciate honesty. If you are unsure about something, let them know this is new for you, and you want to give it a try. Not having all the answers is okay. It may not feel like having conversations about culture will change the world, but done with care and preparation you can have a positive impact on your students and community.
    By having students first explore their own culture, you provide a foundation for learning about cultures different from their own. It gives them a point of reference as they explore the world around them. Engage students on a deeper level and step outside your comfort zone. As Jonathan Kozol writes in On Being a Teacher, “The most memorable lesson is not what is written by the student on a sheet of yellow lined paper in the lesson pad; nor is it the clumsy sentence published (and ‘illustrated’) in the standard and official text. It is the message which is written in a teacher’s eyes throughout the course of his or her career. It is the lesson which endures a lifetime.” Taking lessons beyond the page of sheet music and connecting them to students’ lives will help your lessons endure a lifetime.  

The post Connecting Cultures Through Band appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
What to Teach /august-september-2021/what-to-teach-2/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:29:44 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/what-to-teach-2/       One of the most difficult tasks in teaching is determining what the student does not know. In the first lessons, it is necessary to take an assessment of where the student is and what areas need to be rebuilt from the foundation on up. While the examples in this article relate to […]

The post What to Teach appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
 
    One of the most difficult tasks in teaching is determining what the student does not know. In the first lessons, it is necessary to take an assessment of where the student is and what areas need to be rebuilt from the foundation on up. While the examples in this article relate to the flute, most of the ideas are applicable to other instruments.

Dealing with the Case
    A college violin professor colleague remarked that he could tell what level of advancement prospective students were at before hearing them play by simply watching how they took the violin out of the case. An advanced student, who perhaps possesses a more expensive instrument, carefully and slowly removes the violin from the case while a less experienced student exhibits little care or respect for the instrument by quickly removing the violin from the case and perhaps accidentally banging the instrument on the case or table.
    This scenario is often repeated in the flute studio. The student quickly removes the flute from the case and begins to put the flute together without aligning the tenon on the footjoint with the tenon box (or receiver) on the body of the instrument. Then the headjoint is inserted at an angle which with repeated attempts, the end of the headjoint is no longer round. Inexperienced students do not realize how critical the fitting of the tenon and tenon box are to the flute having the capability to produce a ringing sound. Inexperienced flutists may also grab the keys when assembling the flute rather than placing the hands on the tubing where there are no keys. Grabbing the flute by the keys can bend them, while the natural oils on the hands have an adverse effect on the pads.
    How many teachers take the time to show how to take the flute out of the case other than in beginner lessons? It is equally important to demonstrate how to take the flute apart after playing and replace it in the case. While discussing assembling the instrument with students, remind them that there should be nothing in the case except the flute. Cleaning rods, pencils, pens, glasses, phone, and change are best kept in a zippered compartment of the case cover or flute bag. A couple times a year, have a handi-vac available for students to vacuum the case. The lint that appears over time can affect the performance of the pads and rods.


photo by Kirby Fong



Aligning the Flute

    I asked a clarinet professor friend if his students aligned their instruments well. He said he had never thought about it, but the next day checked students’ alignment and found that not one had the clarinet adjusted correctly. This is true for flutists too. The better you become as a player, the more you strive for consistency. The only way to have consistency is to have the flute aligned the same way each time you play.
    There are three common threads in aligning the headjoint of the flute with the body. The classic alignment which was taught by Joseph Mariano, William Kincaid, Julius Baker, and Frances Blaisdell aligned the center of the embouchure hole with a line in the center of the right-hand keys. There is another group of flutists that prefer a modified Rockstro which aligns the outside of the embouchure hole with a line in the center of the right-hand keys. In some areas, flutists play with a full blown Rockstro where the embouchure hole is rolled in even more. The Rockstro position results is having the right shoulder in an uncomfortable position, so in the US, it is not in favor as eventually the flutist will experience pain.
    In beginning lessons, many teachers align the headjoint and mark straight lines on the headjoint and body several times around the tube to aid in aligning the headjoint. These marks last only a few weeks and then must be redone. As students advance, they will be able to place these marks themselves.

Stance
    How students place their feet when playing tells you a lot. Students who play in a marching band have been taught to play with the feet side by side. However, the flute is an asymmetrical instrument and should be played with the left foot in front and right foot in back. Other asymmetrical instruments are the bassoon, French horn, trombone, tuba, and strings. Marching band rules also require flutists to hold the instrument parallel to the marching field with the elbows up. Most professional flutists turn the head to the left and then let the flute angle down somewhat and let the arms hang which positions the elbows in a more down position.

Warmup
    When listening to a flutist warm up, band-trained flutists often play long tones on a Bb major scale and continue with the type of warmup a band might use. They may only know a few scales (such as F, Bb, Eb, and G). A good warmup should include harmonics for embouchure agility, articulation strokes (T, K, Hah, TK and TKT), trills (for warming individual fingers), finger patterns (half and whole step, gruppettos, mordents, top octave), vibrato work, and theoretical material such as scales of all kinds, thirds, sixths, arpeggios, and seventh chords. From a student’s warmup, you can calculate what is missing and develop a plan to fill in the gaps over the next months. Working with a printed circle of fifths and a photo of a one or two octave keyboard helps to explain what half and whole steps are, and how scales are constructed.

Etudes
    Many students arrive with no etude books; others arrive with etude books in which only regional and all-state etudes have been studied. Many times, I have asked, “What etudes have you studied?” and received the reply, “Some in the blue book and a few in the red book.” This response offers little help in learning what the student has worked on in the past. There are many blue and red books.
    Students often view etudes as the weekly torture; however, as their theoretical technical skills improve, so will the ease in which etudes are learned. This is one of the best reasons to teach scales and arpeggios. Some students are not used to preparing one to four etudes a week and have poor practice skills to use in learning new material. Here is a simple practice outline that the students can use and then check off once done. In the early lessons, the teacher should mark the breathing places that are appropriate for the student’s size and advancement. I also mark the section so students learn that once they have mastered the first 16 measures, they are repeated at the end with few alterations.

    •    Tongue each note 4 times, 3 times, 2 times using varied tempos.
    •    Tongue each note 1 time, using T, K, or Hah, at a slower tempo.
    •    Chunk by beamed notes. In 4/4, this would be also by beat.
    •    Chunk by one measure, then two, then four.
    •    Metronome work: start slowly and work up a few ticks each day.

    Piano methods often have four books for students to use at the same time. These may address technique, simple pieces or etudes, performance repertoire, and theory (note-speller). While flute method books are usually inclusive of many of these things, this curriculum may be duplicated by assigning etudes in several books that are in the same key. Key saturation is more beneficial for an inexperienced student than changing key every week. Once a student is more advanced, changing keys at each lesson offers benefits that are more useful at that stage of development. Etudes by Kohler, Kummer, and Gariboldi are a good entry point for students who have only studied in a band program.  These may be found as a free download on . If you enjoy adding duets to the curriculum, there are many available on imslp.

Solo Repertoire
    For over 20 years I taught at a summer music festival. Each spring I listened to audition recordings to select 10 flutists to attend the festival. I heard some amazing Hue Fantasies and Nielsen Flute Concertos only to find when students arrived at the festival that they had extremely poor sightreading and theoretical technical skills. As a result, I added a section to the audition form that asked them, “How long have you been working on this music?” The answers surprised me – two years, three years etc. Recently I was talking with a university professor who also had noticed the discrepancy between recorded and in-person auditions. The professor said he too had added this question.  Teaching music by rote is a slow process and really does not make students more advanced for the future. They may be able to play a challenging piece because it has been parrot-taught to them, but as a functioning musician, there simply is not anything there.
    When I re-auditioned students for the festival or for university ensemble placements, I added a simple sightreading piece. One of my favorites was by Kuhlau, 8-bars long, in 3/4 meter, G minor, and with some dotted quarters. Almost every flutist stumbled someplace in the melody and later apologized for their poor sightreading skills. Most students have played very little in 3/4 meter and in minor keys. It is a telling experience for them when confronted with sightreading simple melodies.
    This leads me to encourage teachers to select level appropriate solo repertoire. While is it fun to teach concertos by Ibert, Nielsen, etc., many students never learn the intermediate level repertoire which includes Handel, Telemann, and Vivaldi Sonatas and works by Donizetti, Bizet, Gluck, Godard, Andersen, and Kohler. Teaching this repertoire first means that when students are ready for the Ibert, they will be able to learn it by reading the notes and understanding the rhythm rather than by rote instruction.

Last Caution
    When teaching pedagogy seminars, I encourage teachers to go slowly and thoroughly building a foundation from the bottom up. This takes patience. I also encourage teachers to teach what a student needs rather than what interests the teacher. Each of us in our enthusiasm for the flute and music would really like to talk about what we are thinking and practicing, but for students these topics may be years off.    

The post What to Teach appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
Remembering the Revelli Years An Interview with Arthur Cohen /august-september-2021/remembering-the-revelli-years-an-interview-with-arthur-cohen/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 01:14:38 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/remembering-the-revelli-years-an-interview-with-arthur-cohen/       Some of my favorite recordings can be found in The Revelli Years, the legendary five-box, twenty-four LP set released by Golden Crest Records between 1980 and 1983. These recordings, all from live concerts under the baton of William D. Revelli, set a new standard for university bands, and the performances in this collection […]

The post Remembering the Revelli Years An Interview with Arthur Cohen appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>


 

    Some of my favorite recordings can be found in The Revelli Years, the legendary five-box, twenty-four LP set released by Golden Crest Records between 1980 and 1983. These recordings, all from live concerts under the baton of William D. Revelli, set a new standard for university bands, and the performances in this collection are still a marvel.
    Strangely, The Revelli Years was never released digitally, so the only way to listen to these recordings is via the original LPs. Seeking to excavate them from obscurity, I resolved that one of my pandemic projects would be to digitize this collection, one LP at a time, in my university’s audio lab and post them on YouTube for a new generation to enjoy. The response was beyond my expectation.
    One special email came from Arthur Cohen, whose voice can be heard on these recordings as the announcer for the University of Michigan Marching Band. Cohen was a graduate student at Michigan in the 1960s during Revelli’s tenure as the conductor of both the symphonic and marching bands. Eager to learn more about his experiences, we conducted an interview by Zoom.

Cohen and Revelli in 1964.

What led you to  the University of Michigan, and how did you wind up as the announcer for the University of Michigan Marching Band?
    It was 1964, and I was about to graduate from Boston University. I won a National Association of Broadcasting scholarship. The University of Michigan offered a graduate degree in communication and getting a master’s degree from Michigan seemed like a good choice. I applied and was accepted into the program.  
    Several days after getting settled in Ann Arbor, someone handed me a postcard announcing the search for a band announcer for the University of Michigan Marching Band. While in past years the announcer had come from the School of Music, my new acquaintance thought that my former work as a news anchor at WBUR in Boston might make me a good candidate for the post.
    The postcard had the name and telephone number of the director of bands, William D. Revelli. I had no idea that at Michigan Revelli was a god. I also  had never been to a Big Ten school and had never seen the Michigan Band perform. Nevertheless, I called the number and arranged to meet Revelli the following day.

What were your first impressions of Revelli?
    The north campus of the university, which eventually housed the music school and Revelli Hall, did not exist in 1964, so I met Revelli in a small house nearby that had become his office. Revelli was seated behind his desk in front of a long row of filing cabinets. After a few moments of pleasantries, Revelli told me, as I had suspected, “The announcer usually comes from our music school, but please, let me hear you.”
    “Dr. Revelli,” I started, “I honestly have no idea what the Michigan band announcer sounds like. In fact, I have never even been to Big Ten football game. I have only been on campus for a few days, and someone handed me this postcard saying you were looking for an announcer for the Michigan band.”
    To Revelli’s credit, he didn’t toss me out. I think he was a bit stunned, and perhaps amused, but he got up and pulled a script from a drawer in the filing cabinet and handed it to me. Standing in front of the seated god, I began: “Ladies and gentlemen…presenting the University of Michigan Marching Band under the direction of William D. Revelli….” I continued reading a few more paragraphs until I reached the final “Band, take the field!”
    He smiled. He must have liked it. Being the consummate perfectionist that he was, he asked, “Would you meet me at the Michigan Stadium tomorrow? I would like to hear you in the stadium.” “I would if I knew where it was,” I replied. Once again, he smiled and laughed, and we set a time.

What did it feel like to be there that first time?
    The Big House, home to the Michigan Wolverines, sits in a bowl. Its profile doesn’t do it justice. From the top of the press box, you can look down to an enormous field with seating for over 110,000 spectators. Newly painted on the center of the grass field was the famous Block M. Standing on the M was Revelli. Other than the custodian who escorted me to the press box overhead, we were alone in that immense temple of football.
    Revelli looked very small from my perch so far away. He waved at me to begin, and, strapping on a microphone, I completed the audition. There must have been something in the water because the next morning he called me with the news that I was the announcer for the famous University of Michigan Marching Band for the 1964-65 season.

Cohen at the Rose Bowl in 1965

What were some of the challenges you encountered as you settled into the job?
    The first game coincided with Band Day when thousands of high school band students were invited to participate. Announcing the entrance of the high school band from Ypsilanti, Michigan gave me pause. I had never seen the word. After pushing the mute button on the microphone stand, a local reporter helped me through what could have been my first blunder. It all worked out in the end.
    In November, we traveled to Columbus for our annual rivalry game against Ohio State. The band was performing Threnody: An Elegaic Tribute to the Memory of John F. Kennedy by Richard Maltby. My narration included reading a portion of Kennedy’s inauguration speech while the band was playing. Imagine my surprise on game day when I learned that the announcing booth at Ohio Stadium was soundproof – I couldn’t hear the band! Fortunately, I had written my script on a copy of a first trumpet score. By watching Revelli’s conducting pattern, and counting, we made it to the end of the piece, and all was well. We got through it, and Revelli hugged me afterwards. I never told him what had happened.
    Another huge challenge was time management. Daily band practice, performances each Saturday, and travel to away games made it difficult for me to invest the kind of time I needed to successfully complete the courses I was taking for my master’s degree. There were projects, papers and tests galore. A great deal of additional time was required just to type out reports and the like.
    Looking to solve this organizational nightmare, I created a calendar on a huge artist board. Using colored markers, I devised a color-coded system: red meant a test, project, or paper deadline, yellow was for band travel, and green was for something I no longer remember. To complete the item in red, I sometimes had to finish a paper several weeks before the deadline. It was a good lesson in organization.

On a more positive note, what were the highlights of that season?
    The 1964-65 year was great for Michigan football. They went 9–1, and at the end of the season I traveled with the band to the Rose Bowl and to Disneyland. Revelli, pleased with my work, asked me to stay on as announcer for the University of Michigan Symphonic Band in the spring, and we went on a tour of the Midwest. During the year, I became very close with Revelli and his family, and he often invited me over to his home for meals. These are wonderful memories.

Cohen at the Rose Bowl in 1965

What was he like and what did you learn from him?
    Revelli was always very kind and to me – congenial and fatherly. He treated me like I was a member of his family. Some of the band members, however, were fearful of him. Revelli had a fierce dedication to excellence and was a stern taskmaster. A band member once explained that the “sequence of our attitudes toward him often went from fear to anger to respect to awe to reverence.” It was said that anyone who had come in contact with him was left with an impression that would last a lifetime.
    His attention to perfection definitely rubbed off on me as well. For a long while after graduating from Michigan, I could not listen to the radio. After working with Revelli, I realized that many of the groups that were popular at the time didn’t live up to his standards, and it bothered me to hear things like wrong notes and out-of-tune singing.
    I distinctly recall a speech that Revelli gave immediately before the Rose Bowl. It was so memorable that I wrote it down. He said: “Demand of yourself! How much do you demand of yourself? Not even 10 percent, some of you.  How can you dedicate yourself to your future positions in the musical world when you can’t dedicate yourself right now to what you’re doing in a simple little march? The world is full of people who do things just about right. Just about. And a few at the top do them just right – most of the time. Nobody’s perfect!
    “When are you going to start demanding of yourself what I demand of myself? When are you going to be as uncompromising with what you do as I am uncompromising in what I hear and what I insist on? When? Are you waiting for some miracle? The miracle will be when you demand of yourself everything you’ve got of yourself. And I don’t only mean 5 minutes out of 10; I mean 10 minutes out of 10; I mean 60 minutes out of an hour, 24 hours a day, or at least all of your waking hours. I don’t want it to be just about right! To me, just about right is terrible!
    “Now, nobody is killed when you play a half note as a dotted quarter. But you might, from learning to play a half note as a full half note, make the difference in the lives of 50,000 little kids who are hearing somebody play beautifully. I don’t care if it’s Stars and Stripes, The Victors, or something else. There’s a pride in doing it just right. Anyone who does less can be forgiven, but more, they should be pitied.” It is hard to imagine anyone giving a speech like that today, but it worked, and the band consistently rose to his standard of excellence.

What path did your life take after Michigan?
    After working in advertising as a television producer and traveling most of the time, I switched careers and became a life insurance agent. I am now semi-retired and live with my wife, a retired attorney, and two West Highland Terriers.
    I continue to perform music as a hobby. I have a background in woodwind instruments, own several guitars, and play banjo and guitar in five-man band with my former rabbi. I am looking forward, as we all are, to end of the pandemic when we can gather and make music again.     

The post Remembering the Revelli Years An Interview with Arthur Cohen appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
The Nuances of Alternate Positions /august-september-2021/the-nuances-of-alternate-positions/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:31:32 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/the-nuances-of-alternate-positions/     Wind players typically begin wrestling with alternate fingerings early in their playing careers. The number of notes with only one available fingering on these instruments is relatively small, but in most cases a primary fingering is easily identified, with others labeled as alternate. While determining how and when to employ alternate fingerings is […]

The post The Nuances of Alternate Positions appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>

    Wind players typically begin wrestling with alternate fingerings early in their playing careers. The number of notes with only one available fingering on these instruments is relatively small, but in most cases a primary fingering is easily identified, with others labeled as alternate. While determining how and when to employ alternate fingerings is important for all wind players, this is especially vital for trombonists. One reason is obvious: the trombone’s inherent mechanical difficulties can sometimes be mitigated through the judicious use of alternate slide positions. However, mechanical ease is not the only factor to consider when determining which positions to use in a given passage. This article will briefly consider why certain positions are primary and others alternate, and then explore the factors that should inform position choices.

Primary and Alternate Positions
    In my most recent article for The Instrumentalist (Understanding Brass Instruments, June 2020), I explained how the harmonic series is the key to understanding how brass instruments work. I used as my example a simple chart showing the first eight partials in each of the seven slide positions on a tenor trombone without using the F-attachment. (below)
    There, my point was that the intervals between partials are the same in each position, as are the tuning tendencies of each partial, and that this pattern holds for all brass instruments. The harmonic series, then, becomes a tool for finding alternate fingerings or positions for various purposes. For now, I want to focus on something else: the favored slide position for a given note is almost always the one closest to first position. This is because the closer you are to first position, the shorter the instrument is, and the greater the proportion of conical tubing compared to cylindrical. When the slide is extended or valves engaged, the instrument has greater resistance both because of the longer tube and the greater proportion of cylindrical tubing. The slide and valve tubing maintain a constant diameter, while the bell and main tuning slide have conical tubing that expands and thus has greater area within. A less resistant instrument will more easily facilitate the production of a full and resonant sound, thus the usual preference for positions closer to first.
    The only exception to this in the notes pictured below is Ab4, which is so flat in first position that it is unusable there, and thus the next available position, third, is preferred. (The remaining notes in the seventh partial can be played on trombone using a significant slide position adjustment; that entire partial is normally unusable on valved brass instruments.)
While these shorter positions are the primary positions for each note, players will often use alternate positions for a variety of reasons. These can be grouped into the following four categories.

Trombone harmonic series chart (eight partials, seven positions)



Improved Mechanics

    The most obvious reason for using alternate positions is greater technical ease by reducing the number of long slide movements and changes of direction needed. An easy place to introduce this concept is the tune Jingle Bells in the key of Bb, which is found in many beginning band methods.

Jingle Bells, Essential Elements 2000, Tim Lautzenheiser, et al.

    While advanced players will not always use an alternate position in a slower passage like the eighth bar here, in other respects this is a great candidate for alternate position use. Remaining in sixth position for the F3 eliminates the long motion from sixth position back to first, as well as the immediate change of direction required to go back to fourth position for the next note. That this is a familiar tune and an easy passage makes this ideal for introducing of alternate positions and a key reason for their use.
    Of course, advanced trombonists use alternate positions for mechanical advantage to great effect in difficult technical passages. The trombone showpieces of Arthur Pryor (1870-1942) supply numerous examples of this, including the following cadenza from Fantastic Polka.
    In this cadenza (see example below), using alternate positions while moving through the series of diminished seventh chords eliminates excess motion. particularly shifts in direction, while creating a repetitive slide pattern that is comparatively easy to execute, although some tuning adjustments are needed. This enables a skilled player to increase speed while maintaining a fluid motion, creating greater ease of mechanical execution and improved articulation.  

Arthur Pryor, Fantastic Polka Cadenza

Timbral Consistency
    The remaining reasons for using alternate positions are perhaps less obvious than increasing mechanical ease but should nevertheless factor into a player’s position choices. First, consider timbre. As already indicated, the position closest to first for a given note ordinarily yields the fullest sound. However, there are instances where a lighter sound is desirable, and this is most easily achieved in an outer position. For example, in keys like Gb major and B/Cb major, the leading tone (F and A#/Bb, respectively) can be played in first position, but the tonic is in an outer position. Here, choosing an alternate position that keeps the leading tone and the tonic in the same partial lends consistency of sound while also preventing the leading tone from overwhelming the tonic due to its fuller sound in first position. Consider this example from the Trombone Concerto by Nicolai Rimsky-Korsakov (1844-1908), where leading tone-tonic relationships (or similar relationships) like this abound in just a few bars:

Rimsky-Korsakov Trombone Concerto, 2nd mvt.

    The places where players can use alternate positions are marked above the notes. Except for the first F3 in the penultimate bar, the alternate position provides an obvious mechanical advantage in addition to considerations of timbre. However, most students will play all of the indicated notes in first position if not instructed otherwise. To my ear, the timbral considerations are even more important here, as moving back to first position for these notes gives them a certain weight that is inappropriate and also introduces an articulation issue. These alternate positions yield a consistency of timbre that is particularly becoming in addition to the greater technical ease.  

Tuning Adjustments
    The handslide theoretically facilitates accurate intonation on every note in nearly every available position, but the trombone also has the same tuning tendencies of the various partials as every other brass instrument. Choosing positions that make these tendencies serve musical purposes makes playing much easier. For example, while D4 is ordinarily played in first position, fourth position is a common alternate that often yields greater mechanical efficiency but also tends to be a bit sharp relative to the first position note. In a chord where that note needs to be raised – G major, for example – playing D4 in fourth position can help to lock in the tuning by taking advantage of the tuning tendency that already exists.
    Such possibilities are even more numerous and perhaps more helpful the upper register. C5 is most often played in either first or third position, and it tends to be slightly sharp in the former and slightly flat in the latter. Playing in first position might help one to properly tune an F major triad, where the C needs to be raised, while in Ab major, where it needs to be lowered, third position might be most helpful. Because the upper register partials are so close together, position choices have less impact on mechanical ease than in the lower part of the range, where outer positions are more common. Instead, tuning becomes a primary consideration, as does timbre.

Improved Articulation
    Regarding articulation, trombonists are commonly taught to consider alternate positions in legato passages where alternate positions will cause the player to cross partials in the overtone series or engage a valve, thus creating opportunities for natural slurring without use of the legato tongue. That advice is wise and often helpful. For example, in the passage below from the Trombone Concerto by Gordon Jacob (1895-1984), playing the Bb3 in the sixth bar in fifth position, while yielding no obvious technical advantage (it merely delays a large slide movement by less than one beat), allows the player to maintain consistency of articulation throughout the passage. The player will use natural slurs for all of the indicated slurs instead of introducing the legato tongue as would be necessary to play this note in first position. Playing the C3 in the next bar using the F-attachment in first position has a similar effect; most players will do this intuitively. Besides creating more consistency of articulation, using natural slurs throughout this passage makes the rapid tonguing required for the remaining notes just a bit easier.

Jacob Trombone Concerto, 1st mvt.

    It is worth noting that sometimes the smoothest articulation is achieved when one eschews a natural slurring opportunity requiring a very long slide movement in favor of using the legato tongue in combination with a shorter slide movement. Consider the above Rimsky-Korsakov excerpt again. Playing the Bb3 in the eighth bar in first position permits using a natural slur, but the long slide movement might negate the advantage of the natural slur by jostling the instrument in a way that creates an articulation of its own, in addition to creating a timbre issue. Although this effect is largely mitigated when the slide is in good repair and one has efficient slide technique, shorter motions with fewer changes in direction combined with good tonguing technique (particularly a good legato tongue) often facilitate the best articulation.
    While trombonists most often use alternate positions for mechanical ease, timbre, tuning, and articulation should also factor into slide position choices. As the above excerpts exemplify, these considerations often overlap, thus making these choices quite easy for attentive players. Trombone students should develop the fullest possible understanding of the overtone series and the alternate position opportunities that exist, and then use these to make playing easier and the sound more beautiful.     

The post The Nuances of Alternate Positions appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
Engaging Ways to Build Music Literacy /august-september-2021/engaging-ways-to-build-music-literacy/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:19:31 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/engaging-ways-to-build-music-literacy/       Reading is one of the most important skills we ever learn. Author Louis L’Amour wrote, “A parent or teacher has only his lifetime, a good book can teach you forever.” The same holds true for music. Learning to read and notate music gives students a voice to express their ideas.     […]

The post Engaging Ways to Build Music Literacy appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
 
    Reading is one of the most important skills we ever learn. Author Louis L’Amour wrote, “A parent or teacher has only his lifetime, a good book can teach you forever.” The same holds true for music. Learning to read and notate music gives students a voice to express their ideas.
    Inspiration in the music classroom can come with every milestone – holding the instrument for the first time, discovering exciting and unfamiliar music, and feeling musical goosebumps for the first time. These sparks ignite our students’ fires for learning. What if we could create those same sparks when teaching music literacy skills?
    The following lessons, ideas, and resources can improve literacy in your classroom. I have used all of them successfully with my students. I teach many students with reading difficulties or negative feelings toward reading, and found I needed ways to engage them and make them love the process.
    Under each topic below I describe how I present the content to students and leading questions that keep them engaged. Take as much or as little as you want. Change it. Modify it. Personalize it for your students. I hope that these ideas will help make a memorable experience for your students and light more sparks in your classroom. (
All of the materials mentioned in this article can be found online at .)

Word Find (Musical Alphabet)
    For this activity, I use slides that I have made or a dry erase board depending on the available technology. The activity introduces the musical alphabet and gets students thinking and engaging with the concept in different ways.
    I start by projecting the musical alphabet, out of order, in a cloud bubble using Google Slides. I ask, “What do you notice about the letters? How many do you see?” Next, I have students see how many words they can make using the letters on the board. This part happens in small groups with a five-minute time limit. After the time is up, we go around the room and make one list on the board. When all of the responses have been recorded, I comment, “Even though we only have seven letters we can still say many different things.” Words that the students have found are used later as practice for spelling things out on the staff.
    Next I comment, “These letters that we have been working with make up the musical alphabet. We will only use those seven letters when we play.” I display a slide with the alphabet written out to the letter G horizontally. I ask students to say the musical alphabet forward and then in reverse out loud as a class. The next slide shows the music alphabet written out vertically forwards and backwards. I ask, “What do you notice about this slide?” I have the students read out both columns and then ask, “What do you think happens after the letter G? Do you think that we always have to start at the letter A?” We discuss their ideas, and I reveal that you can start on any note and go forward and backwards when using the musical alphabet. The goal is for students to connect the order of the alphabet and moving vertically in both directions just like the staff as this sets up the process for ledger lines and spaces.
    The next slide shows music alphabet typed out in a grid in which each row and column starts with a different letter for a total of seven rows and eight columns. We practice as a class first, and students select the columns and rows they want to practice. They really enjoy this slide as they do all of the different rows and columns going forward and backwards. When the students understand the concept, I add a metronome and play games in small groups while increasing the tempo. When the students are reciting all of these items, I have them point to the letter in the air as they say it to begin building the concept of steady beat and tracking.

Cloud Bubble

Musical Alphabet Grid

Five Pencils (Understanding the Staff)
    This activity requires five unsharpened pencils of the same color. Put a piece of electrical tape, different color for each pencil, wrapped around the end opposite the eraser. With this activity, the questions for students are crucial.
    Hold the five pencils in one hand covering the end with the electrical tape. Ask students the following questions: What am I holding in my hand? How many do I have? How are they similar? How are they different? The goal of this line of questioning is to have the students understand that they are all the same things. Now flip the pencils over and ask the same questions. The goal of this line of questioning is to have the students understand that while they are all the same things, each one is a different color making it uniquely distinct from the others. This is similar to the lines on a musical staff. They have the same look and basic shape, but where they are located on the staff gives them their unique letter names.

    Then, drop the pencils onto the floor so that when they fall most students can see them. I say, “This is an arrangement, similar to flowers. The pencils landed in a certain way. You can think of it as a picture. Can anyone think of another way to arrange the pencils to make a new picture?” I have several students try it and show the class and then continue with the following even if someone has made a staff.
    I say, “There is a musical picture we can make with these pencils. Does anyone know what that might look like?” Usually, one student does, and I let them make it with the pencils on the floor. If not, I will make it. After the student makes a staff on the floor, I ask, “How would you describe this picture?” The emphasis should be on learning to analyze what they see and hear. I explain that music is a series of pictures brought to life by our choices.
    After making the staff out of pencils, I demonstrate extreme high and low notes with my voice. I repeat this and have students echo me. I tell them, “In music we organize high and low sounds using clefs that we hang on the staff.” I ask if they know what the clefs are called. If anyone does, we keep the conversation going based their knowledge.
    I comment, “We have a clef for high sounds and a clef for low sounds. They are always hung on the staff to the far left like the first word of a book.” I draw an example on the board or use a projector to put an example up for students to see. Next, I mention that “Sounds that are high use the treble clef and sounds that are low use the bass clef. It is similar to organizing a binder with folders for each class.”
    “Each line has a name just like you and me. We are all sitting in different places, and so do the lines. So each line has a name different from the others.” At this point, I teach the names of the lines in both clefs and go through the mnemonic device for each clef. Not only do the lines have names but so do the spaces All Cows Eat Grass (bass clef) and FACE (treble clef). I have students come up with their own mnemonics in small groups and share them with the class.
    If there is time remaining, students practice drawing the staff, treble clef, and bass clef. I turn it into an art lesson and let them have fun with it. The bass clef is half of a heart with a colon or a sad emoji rotated with a long lip. The treble clef is a P that continues into a low spiral. The staff is just five pencils or five straight lines. After students have practiced, they receive a sheet with three big boxes on it so they can submit an example of each. I use this as a fun competition to see which looks the closest to a printed one.
    I then cover why we use names and what makes a name special. The goal is for students to understand that names identify things and different names set things apart from each other. “Each line and space has a specific name like you and me. It is how we know which note is which.”

Lifesavers and Peppermints (Reading Notes)
    For this activity you will use Lifesavers, peppermints, a Tootsie Roll Pop, a Caramello candy bar, and a peanut M&M. (I leave the M&M’s in the bag due to allergies.) I have a large bag of both peppermints and Lifesavers but only one of the other candies for demonstration purposes. The goal of this activity is for students to become comfortable reading notes on the staff.
    I start by holding up the Caramello, Tootsie Roll Pop, and small bag of M&M’s one by one and asking what is in the middle of each one? “How do we know? Where do you look?” I steer the conversation toward the fact that what is in the middle of the candy gives the information. I highlight that the middle is the what gives the candy its name, and that this is similar to musical notes.
    While holding up a peppermint and a Lifesaver,  I ask how they are similar and different. The goal is for them to observe that one has a solid center and one has a hollow center. I continue, “All of the noteheads that you see in music will either look solid like a peppermint or a hollow like a Lifesaver and you always need to look at the middle.”
    I then mention that noteheads can be on a line or a space regardless of whether they are filled in or not. Digital flash cards that I have created allow students to practice with and without a clef. Students can select cards (sorted by instrument) and start answering the questions. After clicking on answer, the card tells them if they are correct or not. I use these flash cards just for student practice and not for a grade or to keep score.
    The next step is to put the peppermints and Lifesavers on the staff. The class practices identifying whether the note is on a line or a space using slides I created that show a staff with either a peppermint or a Lifesaver on it. (See below) If a student answers correctly, they get a peppermint or Lifesaver. After half of the students have answered a question, I open a new set of slides that practice the same concept but with the two different types of noteheads.
    Then I review the lines and spaces of both clefs, reminding them of what was covered previously. I have another similar set of slides to practice as a class with a treble clef and bass clef on the left side. As I use these slides, I ask students to identify which clef they use when playing and then identify the note name.  

Conclusion
    I have many other games and activities that I use with students to engage their interest in these concepts. The new school year will have many challenges. Presenting topics by focusing on the process, teaching the students how to teach themselves, and engaging with the material in new, fun ways will be critical for success. Create and light the sparks that will keep the fires burning throughout the year. 

Identifying Peppermints and Lifesavers on the Staff

The post Engaging Ways to Build Music Literacy appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
Music For Prague, 1968 The Composing, Rehearsing and Premiering of a Masterpiece /august-september-2021/music-for-prague-1968-the-composing-rehearsing-and-premiering-of-a-masterpiece/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:03:23 +0000 https://theinstrumenta.wpengine.com/uncategorized/music-for-prague-1968-the-composing-rehearsing-and-premiering-of-a-masterpiece/       Czech-born composer Karel Husa (1921-2016) won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 for his String Quartet No. 3 and a Grawemeyer Award for his Concerto for Cello and Orchestra in 1993. Although these pieces garnered prestigious prizes for Husa, he is best known for his wind band/ensemble masterpiece, Music for Prague, 1968, which […]

The post Music For Prague, 1968 The Composing, Rehearsing and Premiering of a Masterpiece appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>
 
    Czech-born composer Karel Husa (1921-2016) won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 for his String Quartet No. 3 and a Grawemeyer Award for his Concerto for Cello and Orchestra in 1993. Although these pieces garnered prestigious prizes for Husa, he is best known for his wind band/ensemble masterpiece, Music for Prague, 1968, which has received over 10,000 documented performances. In 1969, Husa created an orchestral version of the piece that has been performed many times by the world’s leading symphonic orchestras. (Conductor George Solti was a great champion of the work).

    On August 20, 1968, Russian and Warsaw Pact forces invaded Czechoslovakia to crack down on the government’s Spring reformist movement (aimed at providing greater freedom of speech and incentives to foster free enterprise) that was centered in Husa’s home city of Prague. Husa spent the night of August 21, 1968 listening to radio reports about what was happening. Distressed by the tragic news, he expressed his feelings through composition.
    A commission he had just received from conductor Kenneth Snapp and the Ithaca College Concert Band provided him with the perfect vehicle to do so. During the next month and a half, using serial, avant garde and traditional compositional techniques, Husa composed a powerful, dramatic four movement, 22-minute long overt response to the Soviet invasion of Prague and his homeland.

    Music for Prague, 1968 abounds with symbolism. A 15th-century Hussite anthem, Ye Warriors of God, symbolizes resistance and hope, bell sounds reflect Prague’s “hundred spires,” trombones imitate air raid sirens, oboes play Morse code-like passages, and a piccolo sounds bird calls, a symbol of freedom, something the people of Prague have only experienced briefly during its thousand years of existence.
    Over the years many articles and dissertations have been written on the work’s background, structure, interpretation and performance challenges. However, no one (to my knowledge) has investigated what transpired in the rehearsals that led up to its premiere performances. Apparently neither Husa nor Snapp left notes, documentation of what transpired during the rehearsals or at its premieres. I decided to contact former students who played in the Ithaca College Concert Band at the time to enquire about their remembrances of what occurred.

    Music for Prague, 1968 was a radically different piece – unlike any work played by wind bands at the time. For many players in the band, it was their first encounter with real contemporary music with elements that included new notational symbols, serial composition, technical demands, quarter-tones, and improvisation.

Rehearsals
    The Ithaca College Concert Band began rehearsing Music for Prague, 1968 immediately after performing their first concert of the school year on October 25, 1968. Concertmaster clarinetist Robert Hayden, stated that “the band was not able to ‘read down’ Music for Prague, 1968 from beginning to end without stopping. [We just tried] to get through it. It took several rehearsals [before we got] a feel of how rich and intense the piece was.”
    Band members recalled that Husa spent a considerable amount of time working with both the full and individual sections of the band. He also met and discussed various details of the piece with individual players.
    Frank Phillips, a clarinetist in the band, recalled that “we were in many ways a lab band for him. He would come to rehearsal, pass out parts [which were] scratched out in pencil [and then] rehearse a specific section. I recall one rehearsal when Mr. Husa experimented with the trumpets, having [the players] try different combinations of mutes, one [using a] Harmon [mute] with [the] plunger in; another with [the] plunger out, etc. He would write notes [in] his score [and then] leave [and] return another day. My participation [was] exciting and inspiring. The challenge, [in addition to playing] technically correct, was [to grow in] understanding the emotional intent of the piece. This was a very new experience for me, a naive sophomore clarinet player who had no previous exposure to contemporary literature.”
    Trumpet player Donald Riale also recalled the composer’s experimentation with trumpet mutes. “He had me bring all my mutes to his office and demonstrate various sounds so he could select what he wanted for the trumpets. He [had written in] some impossible mute changes, so I got him to modify those!” Riale added, “I drilled my section on the piece so we were very tight and I’m very proud of the results we got.”
    Bass trombone player Donald Robertson stated that Husa “worked with each instrument to explain their role in the music. When he came to the trombones, my instrument, one of the details he [clarified for] us was that the glissandos [represented] diving airplanes and the bombing of Prague. As I recall, we worked very hard to get this effect and not play the notes in a typical glissando manner.”
    Principal percussionist Gary Rockwell spent a good deal of time with Husa “exploring the complexity of the percussion parts, the fabric of the sounds he wrote as well as the re-writes to [achieve] his intent. While [preparing] his work [Husa] consulted with the percussion [players], and the percussion teacher at the time, Jack Moore. [He] spent [a lot of] time with us rehearsing and balancing the complex parts and overall textures he sought [in the percussion movement].”
    “I was the percussion section leader and [played] the solo snare drum part which moved me every time we played the music, knowing what [Husa wanted to express.] His thorough approach and curiosity were always present.
    John Farrell, another percussionists who was also a composition student of Husa, recalled that “during our weekly sessions, [when] he was composing the piece, Husa discussed various aspects of the multiple percussion instruments [with me. I played the vibraphone part.] He showed me movement 3 and asked what I thought. I was flattered that he asked. I loved the piece although I had no sense of why it was so important to him.”
    Bass Clarinetist Ardis Leyburn Ketterer stated that Husa “was concerned [whether what] he had written for [the] instruments [was] in their proper ranges. Husa [said he] was more familiar with strings. A few changes [had] to be made in the manuscript parts. [Husa] was so easy to work with and appreciative of our efforts.”
    Robert Albretsen, a tuba player in the band. wrote that “the ink was still wet [on the parts at the] first rehearsal. Husa often attended rehearsals encouraging our efforts and fine tuning the score. The turning point in our [preparation] came the day he [communicated] his love for Prague and how the music expressed the indomitable spirit of his people to be once again free. This changed us from a group of musicians trying to play a piece of music to a single organism expressing an idea.”
    First clarinetist Tony Pietricola wrote that he and the other clarinetists “spent hours together in the practice room hashing out the wild interval skips and rhythms. I don’t think we really got it right until we played it in Washington.”


   
    Based upon the recollections of players, it appears that the composition of Music for Prague, 1968 was significantly influenced by what transpired in rehearsals between Husa and the band and the one-on-one discussions he had with individual members of the ensemble.

Premiere Performances
    Music for Prague, 1968 received its official premiere performance by the Ithaca College Concert Band, Kenneth Snapp, conductor, on January 31, 1969, at the Eastern Division Conference of the Music Educators National Conference (MENC) in Washington, DC. Its unofficial premiere took place a month earlier in Ithaca, New York on December 13, 1968, at a concert performed by the same band. Ithaca Journal music critic, George Clarkson, wrote the following about Husa’s new work:
    “The major work of the evening was commissioned by the Concert Band [and] composed by Karel Husa. Very interesting techniques …as well as [orchestration]….The [Hussite] song…as woven by Karel Husa spoke of all the passion of the Czechs and their deep longing for freedom. The song also was a mark of unity appearing at the outset, though never in its entirety, and then coming back with stirring strength in the final Chorale. Even in the tragic  “Aria” section there was a strange majesty. The color of Prague with its ‘hundreds of towers’ came through with…persistent ringing…. One left…with a strong feeling that music as great as this should not be written about – one should only listen and be deeply moved.” (“Music Review: I.C. Concert Band, Ford Hall.” Ithaca Journal, December 14, 1968, p. 8)
    En route to Washington DC (for the MENC concert), the Ithaca College Concert Band stopped and performed a concert at Rahway High School in New Jersey. (Rahway is the home of Rahway State Prison where the Scared Straight TV series was filmed.) In recalling this concert, Robert Albretsen remembered that he had wondered how the students would react to Music for Prague? “Their response was overwhelming! Music for Prague transcends all barriers.”

Washington, DC Premiere Performance
    There was much excitement as the band prepared to go on stage for the MENC Conference concert. Karel Husa was there, and everyone wanted to perform the piece well for him. George Proios recalled that when he was setting up percussion instruments and equipment for the performance, he saw other people setting up some electronic equipment. When he asked them what they were doing and why they were there, they said they were from Radio Free Europe and were arranging electronic equipment to broadcast the performance of Music for Prague, 1968 “to people behind the iron curtain.” This brought home to George the significance of what they were about to do.
    Dr. Snapp and everyone in the band had great concern about the health of bass saxophonist Garrett Lai-Hipp. Robert Albretsen recalled that Garrett had been “very sick with the flu. He [was] on the verge of passing out as concert time approached. [However, he was able to] summon up enough strength to play.” Shortly before the band went on stage, the piccolo player fainted. Again, she recovered and was able to play the concert.
    The audience response to the performance was at first “complete silence and then a roar of applause, as the whole audience rose to its feet for a standing ovation.” Ardis Leyburn Ketterer noted that the audience’s response was “overwhelming!” She said she “had chills” Karen Dembow Erler remembered feeling like “something ground-breaking had occurred, [something] bigger than ourselves.”

    In an interview I did with Karel Husa for The Instrumentalist in 1990, Husa spoke about his presence in the audience at the premiere of Music for Prague, 1968.

    “During the program I ended up sitting with people who didn’t know who I was. It was amazing that at the end of the piece, immediately the people around me stood up; I didn’t stand up immediately, as I was astonished by the reception. Kenneth Snapp, the conductor, signaled me to come to the stage. It was an emotional time for me; I had never before experienced anything so moving. It is satisfying to know that the belief I had in 1968 was not in vain. Life has confirmed that freedom is the supreme thing in man’s existence and it’s worth fighting for.” (Frank Battisti. “Karel Husa – Keeping Ties with Tradition,” The Instrumentalist Vol 44, No. 12, July 1990, p. 42)

    Following the concert Husa joined Dr. Snapp and some of the band members to celebrate the occasion. Robert Albretsen recalled that “Husa was [very] happy but still very humble, praising the performers – very much in character, as always.” He added, “In the early 1990s [when] I was driving to work and listening to NPR, they played a recording of Music for Prague. At its conclusion it was announced that Husa was returning to Prague to conduct the piece with the Prague Symphony Orchestra. Tears of joy flowed so hard that I had to pull off the road.”
    Don Riale said band members felt “it was a major work and were deeply [affected] by [it]. [It took a while before we realized that it was one of] the greatest works ever written for band. Even now, after all my experiences with The USAF Band, I can’t think of another work that [matches] its power and compositional artistry.”
    John von Rhein, music critic for the Chicago Tribune, described “Music for Prague as being “powerful, dramatic and disturbing: even if one listens to it as pure music, it is impossible to remain unaffected by it.”

Karel Husa, The Human Being
    Everyone in the Ithaca College Concert Band respected and admired Karel Husa. Tony Pietricola described him as being “a most kind and gentle human being.” He recalled meeting Husa years later at a MENC Conference in Boston following a performance of Music for Prague, 1968 by the Duquesne Concert Band which had been guest conducted by Husa who was now in his 80s. “I just had to go up to him and tell him I had played in the premiere performance of his piece. He looked at me and said, “Ah, yes, Tony Pietricola, I remember you.” I was not wearing my name badge and had not yet introduced myself! Amazing!
    For Gary Rockwell, “Karel Husa was an inspirational human being.” Fellow percussionist John Farrell thought he was “a vibrant and gentle man, who always had a smile on his face. He would wax whimsically, ‘wouldn’t it be fun to have a 40-piece orchestra to tour around and play all [your] own compositions.’ Fifty years later I can still hear him saying – ‘Isn’t that curious?’ [A comment that is] so much more intellectually inviting than ‘Look at this’. He was a remarkable human being!”


photo by Louis Ouzer

Postscript
    I recall a conversation I had with Karel Husa in the early 1960s. He told me that he hoped to write a piece about Prague that conveyed the beauty and spirit of the city and its people. However, the tragic events that took place in 1968 motivated him to compose a very different kind of piece about the city – a masterpiece that illuminates and expresses the defiant and courageous spirit of Prague and his fellow Czech countrymen/women.     

The post Music For Prague, 1968 The Composing, Rehearsing and Premiering of a Masterpiece appeared first on The Instrumentalist.

]]>